Perception, evolution, truth
How much of reality is it worth it for us to see? Umwelt, etc. Biological phenomenology.
2024-08-18 — 2025-08-28
Wherein the likelihood that organisms’ perceptual representations correspond to external structures is examined by appeal to evolutionary and decision‑theoretic considerations, and adaptive fitness consequences are considered.
Placeholder. Are the representations we organisms have likely to correspond to things in the world, and if so, how? The TED talk version is “Does evolution favour organisms seeing truth”. I do not love this framing myself; I prefer to think about “likely to perceive truth, and if so what that might be”. I do not love this framing, for all that it makes great TED talks. I would prefer to think about decision theory of representations in learners, but that is not catchy.
See also predictive coding and semantics.
1 Do our internal models converge upon truth?
One nice framing of this question is due to Dan Williams: Why do people believe true things?
Donald D. Hoffman has a whole research question about evolutionary selection against veridical perception, including a TED Talk, other talks, Quanta article long form lectures… Sounds like a “selection theorem” argument?
2 Incoming
- Eliezer Yudkowsky’s essay, How an algorithm feels from the inside
- Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Ball