Tiling window managers

Basing your workflow off Tetris seems like a great use of time

Typical xmonad desktop session. Each of the fragments contains a whole other xmonad session, but it is ok because of tail recursion.

The other paradigm to stacking window managers.

Long story, but see:

Basically, these try to put paste windows over every centimetre of the screen in a manner conducive to keyboard automation. Open question: Does this make anything more efficient, for me, the user? It certainly makes it feel like I must be more efficient, because it is difficult, but this seems to be cognitive-dissonance-based reasoning. Were those days of being confused about how to switch apps paid back in terms of thousands of 1-second savings? Are the 1-second savings even real, when half my apps freak out when using tiling window managers?

Anyway, I am trying this out ATM. If I get a Nobel prize from it then great, that will be a data point in favour.

There is some tiling-style layout support in GNOME, which is a little unconventional. Classically, tiling people make a more extreme lifestyle choice, using a tiling window manager which is innocent of all the other widgets and fripperies of modern mainstream Desktop environments. It is more on-brand to switch to old-school naked window managers, such as i3, xmonad and many others.

I could even move to sway which is a Wayland port of the classic i3 tiling window manager. This is now getting far from mainstream, a non-mainstream desktop environment on an X11-alternative. What breaks there? For one thing, they do not support some important things, like NVIDIA GPUs.

Warning! Experimental comments system! If is does not work for you, let me know via the contact form.

No comments yet!

GitHub-flavored Markdown & a sane subset of HTML is supported.