MAPLE

An OK computer algebra system


The other major computer symbolic algebra system (apart from Mathematica) which seems to have not quite as much traction because of… not having a messianic CEO? Having awful branding? It seems to be OK now that I look at it. In particular, it does what I expect regarding transforms of random variables.

Since everyone seems to know Mathematica, I guess I should describe it in terms of that? It is imperative-emphasis rather than functional emphasis; the upshot seems to be that if you want functional behaviour it has to be defined using the “inert” form?


Warning! Experimental comments system! If is does not work for you, let me know via the contact form.

No comments yet!

GitHub-flavored Markdown & a sane subset of HTML is supported.