Internet search engines

Tips, tricks, confidentiality

2021-08-02 — 2026-07-24

quality 6.8

Wherein the Decline of Commercial Search Engines Is Chronicled, and Remedy Is Sought Among Privacy-Minded Alternatives, Metasearch Proxies, and AI-augmented Upstarts, With Kagi and Marginalia Noted as Curious Survivors.

adversarial
computers are awful together
cooperation
faster pussycat
NLP
provenance
search
Figure 1

Finding things on the internet! At one point this felt like a solved problem, but it seems to have become unsolved.

Famously, Google seems not to be particularly good at search any longer. Speculative reasons for this include losing the battle to the SEO, or that human-friendly content is being squeezed aside in general, that Google is spending down its credibility in order to bring in advertising revenue, or that some other more complicated mechanisms and incentives are just making things terrible or boring.

For some quantifiable data on the theme, see webis-de/ecir24-seo-spam-in-search-engines (Bevendorff et al. 2024).

Regardless of the details or reasons, it does seem to be true for me that search results are bad right now.

In addition, I am uncomfortable with the surveillance and tracking involved in search engines. Insofar as they are the way I access the world, they can potentially know too much about me.

I am interested in solving these problems: the badness of search results, the skeeziness of search providers, and more general knowledge discovery and synthesis problems. Let us see if I got anywhere by reading on.

1 Better commercial search providers

Here are some links to search engines which may reduce the degree of user surveillance, or at least diffuse the surveillance across a few different players if I use several of them. Hell they might even provide added value over the classic searches.

Many of these make strong claims to protect user privacy, although few offer substantive guarantees beyond inspecting tracking headers. Some of them repackage other searches; some run their own indices. Most of them have very unclear business models, which makes me uneasy.

1.1 Kagi

An exception to the opaque-business-model rule is Kagi. Their value proposition is, they claim, to be credibly user-centric:

Kagi has no ads and is fully supported only by its users. We worked very hard to provide high quality, fast and tracking-free results at a minimum cost to ensure sustainability of our operation.

By choosing a paid Kagi plan, you are also helping accelerate our mission of humanising the web.

There is no free plan any more, just a 100-search trial, after which it is USD $5/month for 300 searches or $10/month for unlimited. Here is what we get for the money:

  • Kagi search features | Kagi Blog

  • No ads

  • Ability to block/boost domains

  • Bangs allow you to quickly jump to all popular sites on the web.

  • zero telemetry, zero tracking

  • See how fast is a website or how many ads/trackers it has before clicking the result.

They have been criticised for being chaos pants. These criticisms to me seem reasonable but not fatal.

Obviously, if I become a subscriber, they can in principle track me, so the privacy angle hinges on some trust.

1.2 Marginalia

File under quirky/quixotic/small web, Marginalia Search (which moved off search.marginalia.nu in 2025; the old interface lingers at old-search.marginalia.nu):

This is an independent DIY search engine that focuses on non-commercial content, and attempts to show you sites you perhaps weren’t aware of in favour of the sort of sites you probably already knew existed.

The software for this search engine is all custom-built, and all crawling and indexing is done in-house. The project is open source. Feel free to poke about in the source code or contribute to the development!

Still actively developed, which is more than most of the entries below can say.

1.3 Startpage

Startpage claims to repackage Google search results anonymously, AFAIK, although I cannot see much information about why I should believe them on this. Dutch company. To use them as a search bar in Firefox I needed to add a browser extension, for some tedious reason.

In 2019, when the adtech firm System1 took a controlling investment and Privacy Guides delisted them for it (briefly).

1.4 DuckDuckGo

Perennial favourite, duckduckgo is a search engine run by strident privacy advocates, which is laudable I s’pose. The search is… OK. Usually not as good as Google. Every now and again it is serendipitously wonderful, but not reliably.

1.5 Brave

Brave Search recently launched, backed by the creators of the Brave browser. TBC.

1.6 Mojeek

Mojeek/Mojeek Focus (Bookmark) Search Engine

Mojeek was created to provide a globally competitive and genuine alternative search engine based in the UK, and from the outset one that didn’t track its users nor simply retrieve its results from another engine (i.e. to provide real alternative results).

Mojeek’s technology has been developed entirely from scratch by Marc Smith, mostly using the C programming language, and uses no pre-existing search or web crawler technology. All technology and IP is fully owned by Mojeek Limited.

1.7 Qwant

Qwant promises to forget user data rapidly. French company. More interestingly, with Ecosia they now run the European Search Perspective joint venture and its Staan index, which is a serious attempt at a European crawl rather than another Bing reseller — about half of French Qwant queries are served from it.

1.8 Dead ends

runnaroo.com promised to aggregate many other search engines. Taken down in 2021, eaten by scrapers.

searchencrypt.com claimed additional privacy via Perfect Forward Secrecy. The domain is now an SEO content farm shilling solar panels and dental implants.

1.9 Suppressing spam in search results

2 DIY search proxies

A.k.a. meta-searching. I suspect these imply maintenance overhead as the search companies attempt to circumvent this circumvention of their business model. Effectively, we would be participating in an arms race.

2.1 SearXNG

The SearXNG family is a network of metasearch engine portals with the aim of protecting the privacy of users. It does not share users’ IP addresses or search history with the search engines from which it gathers results. Tracking cookies served by the search engines are blocked, etc. There are many user-operated instances, or we can run our own DIY search anonymizer.

searx, the original, is no longer maintained; SearXNG is the fork that kept going. Adam Tauber’s stated reason for walking away is an argument against this whole section: a metasearch engine is only as good as what upstream engines expose, its privacy guarantees are partial because the requests still leave the machine, and it has no memory of what we already read.

Tauber’s answer to that is Hister, which inverts the problem: index the pages we already read instead of proxying queries at engines that indexed everything. Same bet as my local qmd index — a small curated corpus beats a large uncurated one.

2.2 mysearch

mysearch was a local search portal designed to anonymize search requests. Dead.

6 Incoming

7 References

Bevendorff, Wiegmann, Potthast, et al. 2024. Is Google Getting Worse? A Longitudinal Investigation of SEO Spam in Search Engines.” In Advances in Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.