Placeholder, for thinking about the implementation and theory of computation as it has been perturbed by our increasing dependence upon neural models for computing.
1 Quantum devices
TBD
2 Optical devices
I am slightly familiar with Igor Carron’s work on optical processing using randomized linear algebra (Brossollet et al. 2021; Cavaillès et al. 2022; Mohseni, McMahon, and Byrnes 2022).
3 Ising machines
4 References
Aimone, and Parekh. 2023. “The Brain’s Unique Take on Algorithms.” Nature Communications.
Brossollet, Cappelli, Carron, et al. 2021. “LightOn Optical Processing Unit: Scaling-up AI and HPC with a Non von Neumann Co-Processor.”
Cavaillès, Boucher, Daudet, et al. 2022. “A High-Fidelity and Large-Scale Reconfigurable Photonic Processor for NISQ Applications.” Optics Express.
Gershenfeld, N. 1996. “Signal Entropy and the Thermodynamics of Computation.” IBM Systems Journal.
Gershenfeld, Neil A. 2000. The Physics of Information Technology. Cambridge Series on Information and the Natural Sciences.
Gershenfeld, Neil. 2011. “Aligning the Representation and Reality of Computation with Asynchronous Logic Automata.” Computing.
Hooker. 2020. “The Hardware Lottery.” arXiv:2009.06489 [Cs].
Jaeger, Noheda, and van der Wiel. 2023. “Toward a Formal Theory for Computing Machines Made Out of Whatever Physics Offers.” Nature Communications.
Mohseni, McMahon, and Byrnes. 2022. “Ising Machines as Hardware Solvers of Combinatorial Optimization Problems.” Nature Reviews Physics.
Zhu, Lilak, Loeffler, et al. 2023. “Online Dynamical Learning and Sequence Memory with Neuromorphic Nanowire Networks.” Nature Communications.