- Properties
- Gamma processes
- Beta processes
- Poisson processes
- as measure priors
- Compound Poisson processes with non-negative increments
- Inverse Gaussian processes
- An increasing linear function is a subordinator
- Positive linear combinations of other subordinators
- Subordination of subordinators
- Generalized Gamma Convolutions
- via Kendall’s identity
- Multivariate
- References

\[\renewcommand{\var}{\operatorname{Var}} \renewcommand{\dd}{\mathrm{d}} \renewcommand{\pd}{\partial} \renewcommand{\bf}[1]{\mathbf{#1}} \renewcommand{\vv}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}} \renewcommand{\rv}[1]{\mathsf{#1}} \renewcommand{\mm}[1]{\mathrm{#1}} \renewcommand{\cc}[1]{\mathcal{#1}} \renewcommand{\oo}[1]{\operatorname{#1}} \renewcommand{\gvn}{\mid} \renewcommand{\II}{\mathbb{I}}\]

A subordinator is an a.s. non-decreasing Lévy process \(\{\rv{g}(t)\}, t \in \mathbb{R}\) with state space \(\mathbb{R}_+\equiv [0,\infty]\) such that

\[ \mathbb{P}(\rv{g}(t)-\rv{g}(s)< 0)=0, \,\forall t \geq s. \]

That is, it is an a.s. non-decreasing Markov process with homogeneous independent increments.

Tutorial introductions to these creatures are in (Kyprianou 2014; Bertoin 1996, 2000; Sato 1999).

The platonic ideal of a subordinator is probably the Lévy-Gamma process. However there are many more; There is no requirement that the support of a subordinator’s paths is dense in \(\mathbb{R}_+\); for example, counting such Poisson processes are subordinators.

The terminology is weird. Why “subordinator”? Popular references mention their use as a model of random rate of passage of time in the popular Variance Gamma model (Madan and Seneta 1990). I know almost nothing about that but I read a little bit of history in (Seneta 2007). The idea is certainly older than that, though. Surely is implicit in Lamperti? I do not have time for that citation rabbit hole though.

The subordination of a one-dimensional Lévy process \(\{X(t)\}\) by a one-
dimensional increasing process \(\{T (t)\}\) means introducing
a new process \(\{Y (t)\}\) defined as \(Y (t) = X(T (t))\), where
\(\{X(t)\}\) and \(\{T (t)\}\) are assumed to be independent,
and that one-dimensional increasing process is the *subordinator*.

Subordinators can be generalised to beyond one-dimensional processes; see (Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen, Pedersen, and Sato 2001). We can more generally consider subordinators that take values in \(\mathbb{R}^d,\) although such a process no longer has an intuitive interpretation as the rate-of-time-passing, since time is usually one-dimensional in common experience.

## Properties

Let us see what Dominic Yeo says, channelling Bertoin (1996):

In general, we describe Lévy processes by their characteristic exponent. As a subordinator takes values in \([0,\infty),\) we can use the Laplace exponent instead: \[\mathbb{E}\exp(-\lambda X_t)=:\exp(-t\Phi(\lambda)).\] We can refine the Levy-Khintchine formula; \[\Phi(\lambda)=k+d\lambda+\int_{[0,\infty)}(1-e^{-\lambda x})\Pi(dx),\] where k is the kill rate (in the non-strict case). Because the process is increasing, it must have bounded variation, and so the quadratic part vanishes, and we have a stronger condition on the Levy measure: \(\int(1\wedge x)\Pi(dx)<\infty.\) The expression \(\bar{\Pi}(x):=k+\Pi((x,\infty))\) for the tail of the Levy measure is often more useful in this setting. We can think of this decomposition as the sum of a drift, and a PPP with characteristic measure \(\Pi+k\delta_\infty.\) … we do not want to consider the case that \(X\) is a step process, so either \(d>0\) or \(\Pi((0,\infty))=\infty\) is enough to ensure this.

## Gamma processes

See Gamma processes.

## Beta processes

The strictly-increasing flavour, as seen in See Gamma processes.

## Poisson processes

See Poisson processes.

## as measure priors

See Measure priors.

## Compound Poisson processes with non-negative increments

🏗

## Inverse Gaussian processes

See (Kyprianou 2014). Interesting because Minami (2003) gives an interpretation of the multivariate Inverse Gaussian process which is suggestive of a natural dependence model via covariance of a dual Gaussian process. Dependency structure might be interesting.

🏗

## An increasing linear function is a subordinator

We get linear functions both as a baked-in affordance of Lévy processes and as a limiting distribution of a Gamma process whose increment variance goes to zero.

## Positive linear combinations of other subordinators

Say we have a collection of \(m\) independent univariate subordinators, not necessarily from the same family or with the same parameters, stacked to form a vector process \(\{\rv{g}(t)\}\) with state space \(\mathbb{R}_+^{m}\). Take a transform matrix \(M\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times m}\) with non-negative entries. Then the process \(\{M\rv{g}(t)\}\) is still a subordinator (and moreover a Lévy process) although the elements are no longer independent. We could think of that the same trick applied to just the increments, which would come down to the same thing.

🏗

## Subordination of subordinators

Since a subordinator time change of a Lévy process is still a Lévy process, a subordinated subordinator is still a Lévy process and it is still monotone and therefore still a subordinator. Is this convenient for my purposes?

🏗

## Generalized Gamma Convolutions

A construction (Bondesson 1979, 2012; Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen, Maejima, and Sato 2006; James, Roynette, and Yor 2008; Steutel and van Harn 2003) that shows how to represent some startling (to me) processes using subordinators, including Pareto (Thorin 1977a) and Lognormal (Thorin 1977b) ones.

## via Kendall’s identity

(Burridge et al. 2014) leverage a neat result (Kendall’s identity) in (Borovkov and Burq 2001) to produce several interesting families of subordinators with explicit transition densities. These look handy.

## Multivariate

How do we construct a multivariate subordinator process, by which I mean a random process whose realisations are coordinate-wise monotone functions \(\mathbb{R}^D\to\mathbb{R}\)? One obvious way is to take coordinate-wise iid subordinators as the distributions of each coordinate. This is by construction what we want. Questions: How general is such a thing? How easy is it to conditionally sample paths from it? What do we want our multivariate subordinator to do? I care about this especially for multivariate Gamma processes.

## References

*Notices of the AMS*51 (11): 1336–47.

*Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus*. 2nd ed. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 116. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

*Stochastic Simulation: Algorithms and Analysis*. 2007 edition. New York: Springer.

*The Annals of Probability*37 (5): 2066–92.

*Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Winter Simulation: Driving Innovation*, 319–26. WSC ’03. New Orleans, Louisiana: Winter Simulation Conference.

*Bernoulli*12 (1): 1–33.

*Advances in Applied Probability*33 (1): 160–87.

*Lévy Driven Volatility Models*, 70.

*Lévy Processes*. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 121. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

*Lectures on Probability Theory and Statistics: Ecole d’Eté de Probailités de Saint-Flour XXVII - 1997*, edited by Jean Bertoin, Fabio Martinelli, Yuval Peres, and Pierre Bernard, 1717:1–91. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

*Subordinators, Lévy Processes with No Negative Jumps, and Branching Processes*. University of Aarhus. Centre for Mathematical Physics and Stochastics ….

*The Annals of Probability*7 (6): 965–79.

*Generalized Gamma Convolutions and Related Classes of Distributions and Densities*. Lecture Notes in Statistics 76. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

*Electronic Communications in Probability*6: 91–94.

*arXiv:1609.04481 [Math]*, November.

*arXiv:1402.1062 [Math]*, July.

*Fluctuation Theory for Lévy Processes: Ecole d’eté de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XXXV, 2005*. Vol. 1897. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1897. Berlin ; New York: Springer.

*Probability Surveys*5: 346–415.

*Fluctuations of Lévy Processes with Applications: Introductory Lectures*. Second edition. Universitext. Heidelberg: Springer.

*Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics*6 (1).

*The Journal of Business*63 (4): 511–24.

*Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods*32 (12): 2285–2304.

*Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference*, Special Issue: In Celebration of the Centennial of The Birth of Samarendra Nath Roy (1906-1964), 137 (11): 3626–33.

*Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics*08 (01): 33–54.

*Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method*. 3 edition. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

*Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions*. Cambridge University Press.

*Advances in Mathematical Finance*, edited by Michael C. Fu, Robert A. Jarrow, Ju-Yi J. Yen, and Robert J. Elliott, 3–19. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.

*Infinite Divisibility of Probability Distributions on the Real Line*. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

*Scandinavian Actuarial Journal*1977 (1): 31–40.

*Scandinavian Actuarial Journal*1977 (3): 121–48.

*Statistics & Probability Letters*80 (7): 697–705.

*Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability*12 (4): 695–729.

*Biometrika*85 (2): 251–67.

## No comments yet. Why not leave one?