Nothing to see here at the moment, apart from snippets I found interesting, as a guy with passable probability theory but weak financial knowledge.

Financial hacker is pragmatic. I can’t tell if it is fun because I can’t even tell if they are joking but numerai’s introduction to secrecy and information in financial markets is a …singular perspective.

## Fundamental considerations

## Behavioural considerations

## Portfolio design

diversity and risk hedging.

Bookmarked: Amazing science communication by Jonas Degrave, But why is diversification a free lunch?.

The R package introduction Fast Design of Risk Parity Portfolios by Zé Vinícius and Daniel Palomar is an interesting dummy’s guide to “Modern portfolio” and “risk-parity portfolio” theory.

In 1952, Markowitz proposed in his seminal paper [1] to find a trade-off between the portfolio expected return and its risk measured by the variance:

\[\begin{array}{ll} \underset{\mathbf{w}}{\textsf{maximize}} & \mathbf{w}^{T}\boldsymbol{\mu}-\lambda\mathbf{w}^{T}\boldsymbol{\Sigma}\mathbf{w}\\ \textsf{subject to} & \mathbf{w} \ge \mathbf{0}, \quad\mathbf{1}^T\mathbf{w}=1, \end{array}\]

where \(\lambda\) is a parameter that controls how risk-averse the investor is.

Markowitz’s portfolio has been heavily critized for over half a century and has never been fully embraced by practitioners, among many reasons because:

- it only considers the risk of the portfolio as a whole and ignores the risk diversification (i.e., concentrates too much risk in few assets, which was observed in the 2008 financial crisis)
- it is highly sensitive to the estimation errors in the parameters (i.e., small estimation errors in the parameters may change the designed portfolio drastically).
Although portfolio management did not change much during the 40 years after the seminal works of Markowitz and Sharpe, the development of risk budgeting techniques marked an important milestone in deepening the relationship between risk and asset management.…

The alternative risk parity portfolio design has been receiving significant attention from both the theoretical and practical sides because it

- diversifies the risk, instead of the capital, among the assets and
- is less sensitive to parameter estimation errors.
…Risk parity is an approach to portfolio management that focuses on allocation of risk rather than allocation of capital. … While the minimum variance portfolio tries to minimize the variance (with the disadvantage that a few assets may be the ones contributing most to the risk), the risk parity portfolio tries to constrain each asset (or asset class, such as bonds, stocks, real estate, etc.) to contribute equally to the portfolio overall volatility.

Robert Carver has a simple and excellent blog and a couple of books (Carver 2019, 2015) on what I would call “indolent trading”.

## Betting

In the special case of all-or-nothing bets, we have a slightly different outcome space and can model things slightly differently. Introductory: Zvi Mowshowitz on Kelly bets.

## Statistical considerations

How do you learn the parameters of the model? What do estimation errors do to your return?

- Jonathan Kinlay, on market timing strategies via Machine Learning.
- Zoirro project reading list is interesting.
- Machine learning for portfolio diversification comments on Conlon, Cotter, and Kynigakis (2021).
- Hedged Cryptocurrency Strategies

## Technical considerations

Chris Stucchio’s Notes on setting up a Data Science app on Azure is an excellent learn=by-doing tutorial.

Zorro is a financial algorithm development system:

Zorro is free for private traders because its development was partially donated. Our sponsor believed that all people, especially in developing countries, should learn programming and participate in the financial markets. Small, but regular trading incomes for anyone take liquidity out of the financial system and inject it back into the production cycle. This can boost worldwide demand and reduce the divide between rich and poor.

see also Rob Carver’s Setup for a home based systematic trading system

This Blog is Systematic: Diversification and small account size

Trading Software – share trading software | HSBC Australia ## References

*Systematic Trading: A Unique New Method for Designing Trading and Investing Systems*. Petersfield, Hampshire, Great Britain: Harriman House.

*Leveraged Trading: A Professional Approach to Trading Fx, Stocks on Margin, Cfds, Spread Bets and Futures for All Traders*. 1st edition. Harriman House Ltd.

*How to Write a Financial Contract*.

*Journal of Financial Econometrics*13 (2): nbu020.

*Dynamic Hedging: Managing Vanilla and Exotic Options: 64*. 1st edition. New York: Wiley.

*Handbook of Asset and Liability Management*, 1:385–428. Elsevier.

## References

*Systematic Trading: A Unique New Method for Designing Trading and Investing Systems*. Petersfield, Hampshire, Great Britain: Harriman House.

*Leveraged Trading: A Professional Approach to Trading Fx, Stocks on Margin, Cfds, Spread Bets and Futures for All Traders*. 1st edition. Harriman House Ltd.

*How to Write a Financial Contract*.

*Journal of Financial Econometrics*13 (2): nbu020.

*Dynamic Hedging: Managing Vanilla and Exotic Options: 64*. 1st edition. New York: Wiley.

*Handbook of Asset and Liability Management*, 1:385–428. Elsevier.

## No comments yet. Why not leave one?