# Quantitative risk measurement

## Mathematics of actuarial and financial disaster

Actuarial bread-and-butter. The mathematical study of measuring the chances of something terrible happening. This is usually a financial risk, but can also be extreme weather conditions, earthquakes, whatever. BTW, this is distinct from the “risk” in “statistical risk bounds”, which is the domain of statistical learning theory.

How do you evaluate how bad the worst cases are when deciding whether to do something? Generally this involved ignoring how good the best scenario is; Given financial history, probably that’s the niche to worry about filling. How do you trade off the badness and likeliness of the bad cases? This is about the risk measures themselves. For a useful class of distributions to use in this context it might be worth considering extreme value theory.

🏗 introduce risk coherence, and Discuss application to climate risk, and scheduling.

## Value-at-Risk

$$X$$ is a random variable the payoff of a portfolio at some future time, and our quantile of interest is $$0 < \alpha < 1$$.

The $$\alpha-\operatorname{VaR}$$ of an asset $$X$$ with cdf $$F$$ is, up to minus signs, an estimate of the icdf. It is defined as

\begin{aligned} \operatorname{VaR}_\alpha(X) &:= \inf\{x\in\mathbb{R}:\mathbb{P}(X<-x)\leq 1-\alpha\}\\ &= \inf\{x\in\mathbb{R}:1-F(-x)\geq \alpha\}\\ \end{aligned}

## Expected shortfall

“the expected loss of portfolio value given that a loss is occurring at or above the $$q$$-quantile.”

The expected shortfall (ES) is defined

$ES_{\alpha} := \frac{1}{\alpha}\int_0^{\alpha} \operatorname{VaR}_{\gamma}(X)d\gamma\\ = -\frac{1}{\alpha}\left(E[X \ 1_{\{X \leq x_{\alpha}\}}] + x_{\alpha}(\alpha - \mathbb{P}[X \leq x_{\alpha}])\right)$

where VaR is Value At Risk, and where $$x_{\alpha} = \inf\{x \in \mathbb{R}: P(X \leq x) \geq \alpha\}$$

It is also known as the Conditional Value-at-Risk, $$\alpha-\operatorname{CVaR}.$$

According to Wikipedia, I might care about the dual representation, $$ES_{\alpha} = \inf_{Q \in \mathcal{Q}_{\alpha}} E^Q[X]$$ with $$\mathcal{Q}_{\alpha}$$ the set of probability measures absolutely continuous with respect to the physical measure $$P$$, such that $$\frac{dQ}{dP} \leq \alpha^{-1}$$ almost surely.

…Why might I care about that again?

TBC

## G-expectation

I don’t understand this yet, but Shige Peng just gave a talk wherein he argued that the generalised, sublinear expectation operator derived from distributional uncertainty, generate coherent risk measures, although it is not immediately obvious to me how this works. See, e.g. Shige Peng (2004).

## Sensitivity to parameters of risk measures

SWIM is a method for analysis of sensitivity for parameter assumptions in risk measures. (R package) I might use this article as a point of entry to this field if I need it.

An efficient sensitivity analysis for stochastic models based on Monte Carlo samples. Provides weights on simulated scenarios from a stochastic model, such that stressed random variables fulfil given probabilistic constraints (e.g. specified values for risk measures), under the new scenario weights. Scenario weights are selected by constrained minimisation of the relative entropy to the baseline model.

## Rosenblatt transform

Mentioned mnemonically because it seems to arise in QRM all the time. The Rosenblatt transform is the one that takes a vector random variate with a known (continuous) joint distribution and transforms it to a uniform distribution over the unit hypercube.

## References

Acerbi, Carlo, and Dirk Tasche. 2002. Economic Notes 31 (2): 379–88.
Artzner, Philippe, Freddy Delbaen, Jean-Marc Eber, and David Heath. 1999. Mathematical Finance 9 (3): 203–28.
Briand, Philippe, François Coquet, Ying Hu, Jean Mémin, and Shige Peng. 2000. Electronic Communications in Probability 5 (0): 101–17.
Cai, Zongwu, and Xian Wang. 2008. Journal of Econometrics, Econometric modelling in finance and risk management: An overview, 147 (1): 120–30.
Charpentier, Arthur, Laurence Barry, and Molly R. James. 2021. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, May.
Charpentier, Arthur, and Emmanuel Flachaire. 2019. arXiv:1912.11736 [Econ, Stat], December.
Chen, Song Xi. 2008. Journal of Financial Econometrics 6 (1): 87–107.
Chen, Zengjing, Tao Chen, and Matt Davison. 2005. The Annals of Probability 33 (3): 1179–99.
Feng, Zhen-Hua, Yi-Ming Wei, and Kai Wang. 2012. Applied Energy 99 (November): 97–108.
Fishburn, Peter C. 1977. “Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns.” American Economic Review 67 (2): 116–26.
Freedman, David A., and Philip B Stark. 2009. In Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue with the Social Sciences, edited by David Collier, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, and Philip B. Stark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gnecco, Nicola, Nicolai Meinshausen, Jonas Peters, and Sebastian Engelke. 2021. The Annals of Statistics 49 (3): 1755–78.
Hofert, Marius, and Wayne Oldford. 2016. arXiv:1609.09429 [Stat], September.
Hubbard, Douglas W. 2014. How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business. 3 edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Hudson, Paul, WJ Wouter Botzen, Jeffrey Czajkowski, and Heidi Kreibich. 2014. “Risk Selection and Moral Hazard in Natural Disaster Insurance Markets: Empirical Evidence from Germany and the United States.”
Kaplan, E. L., and Paul Meier. 1958. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53 (282): 457–81.
Kaplan, Stanley, and B. John Garrick. 1981. Risk Analysis 1 (1): 11–27.
Marcelo G. Cruz. 2002. Modeling, Measuring and Hedging Operational Risk. Chichester: Chichester : Wiley.
McNeil, Alexander J, Rüdiger Frey, and Paul Embrechts. 2005. Quantitative Risk Management : Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Moscadelli, Marco. 2004. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 557214. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Nolde, Natalia, and Chen Zhou. 2021. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 8 (1): 217–40.
Ou-Yang, Chieh, Howard Kunreuther, and Erwann Michel-Kerjan. 2013. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice 38 (3): 521–46.
Peng, Shige. 2004. In Stochastic Methods in Finance, 165–253. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1856. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
———. 2007. In Stochastic Analysis and Applications, edited by Fred Espen Benth, Giulia Di Nunno, Tom Lindstrøm, Bernt Øksendal, and Tusheng Zhang, 541–67. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Peng, ShiGe. 2009. Science in China Series A: Mathematics 52 (7): 1391–411.
Pesenti, Silvana M., Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich, and Andreas Tsanakas. 2020. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3515274. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Pesenti, Silvana M., Pietro Millossovich, and Andreas Tsanakas. 2019. European Journal of Operational Research 274 (2): 654–70.
Rakhlin, Alexander, Dmitry Panchenko, and Sayan Mukherjee. 2005. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 9 (June): 220–29.
Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela. 2006. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 39 (1): 19–34.
Roussas, George G. 1990. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 25 (1): 81–104.
Scaillet, O. 2004. Mathematical Finance 14 (1): 115–29.
Scandroglio, Giacomo, Andrea Gori, Emiliano Vaccaro, and Vlasios Voudouris. 2013. International Journal of Financial Engineering and Risk Management 1 (1): 6–19.
Sluijs, Jeroen P van der, Matthieu Craye, Silvio O Funtowicz, Penny Kloprogge, Jerome R Ravetz, and James Risbey. 2005. Risk Analysis 25: 481–92.
Sy, Judy P., and Jeremy M. G. Taylor. 2000. Biometrics 56 (1): 227–36.
Taylor, James W. 2008a. Journal of Financial Econometrics 6 (2): 231–52.
———. 2008b. Journal of Financial Econometrics 6 (3): 382–406.
Vázquez, Alexei, João Gama Oliveira, Zoltán Dezsö, Kwang-Il Goh, Imre Kondor, and Albert-László Barabási. 2006. Physical Review E 73 (3): 036127.

### No comments yet. Why not leave one?

GitHub-flavored Markdown & a sane subset of HTML is supported.