Epistemic communities

Descriptive and normative

2021-08-24 — 2025-10-12

Wherein the workings of news media and scientific circles are examined, with attention paid to misinformation, Bayesian design approaches, and impacts on public shared reality.

adaptive
agents
bounded compute
collective knowledge
distributed
economics
game theory
how do science
incentive mechanisms
institutions
learning
mind
networks
provenance
sociology
squad
standards

There’s nothing to say right now about general epistemic communities. I have some thoughts about the specialized epistemic community that is the science community. I’d also like to think about journalism.

Figure 1

1 Bayesian epistemics

A very interesting inverse design approach, i.e. how should we design a system to optimize for truthfulness? See Bayesian epistemics.

2 Incoming

News media and the public’s shared reality. Fake news, indeterminate news, incomplete news, alternative facts, strategic inference, kompromat, agnotology, facebooking to a molecular level. Basic media literacy, and whether it helps. As seen in elections and provocateur twitter bots.

Samuel Butler:

The public buys its opinions as it buys its meat, or takes in its milk, on the principle that it is cheaper to do this than to keep a cow. So it is, but the milk is more likely to be watered.

Figure 2
  • Marisa Abrajano has a provocative list of research topics. I’d like to read her work to see her methodology.

    Marisa Abrajano is professor of political science at the University of California, San Diego. She is also Provost of Earl Warren College. Her research interests focus on racial and ethnic inequalities in the political system, particularly with political participation, voting and campaigns, and the mass media. She is the author of five books. Her latest book, in collaboration with Nazita Lajevardi, explores the politics of misinformation amongst socially marginalized groups

3 References

Barlev, and Neuberg. 2025. Rational reasons for irrational beliefs.” The American Psychologist.
Bazzoli. 2022. Open Science and Epistemic Pluralism: A Tale of Many Perils and Some Opportunities.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Berger, and Luckmann. 2016. “The Social Construction of Reality.” In Social Theory Re-Wired.
Channing, and Ghosh. 2025. AI for Scientific Discovery Is a Social Problem.”
Cross. 2013. Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later.” Review of International Studies.
Eady, Paskhalis, Zilinsky, et al. 2023. Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency Foreign Influence Campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US Election and Its Relationship to Attitudes and Voting Behavior.” Nature Communications.
Farrell, Mercier, and Schwartzberg. 2022. Analytical Democratic Theory: A Microfoundational Approach.” American Political Science Review.
Ferraz-Caetano. 2025. Modeling Innovations: Levels of Complexity in the Discovery of Novel Scientific Methods.” Philosophies.
Hanson, Barreiro, Crosetto, et al. 2024. The Strain on Scientific Publishing.” Quantitative Science Studies.
Kaelbling, Littman, and Moore. 1996. Reinforcement Learning: A Survey.” Journal of Artifical Intelligence Research.
Krumrei-Mancuso, Pärnamets, Bland, et al. 2025. Toward an Understanding of Collective Intellectual Humility.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Littman. 2021. Collusion Rings Threaten the Integrity of Computer Science Research.” Communications of the ACM.
Michelini, Osorio, Houkes, et al. 2023. “Scientific Disagreements and the Diagnosticity of Evidence: How Too Much Data May Lead to Polarization.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
Musen, O’Connor, Schultes, et al. 2022. Modeling Community Standards for Metadata as Templates Makes Data FAIR.” Scientific Data.
Nelson. 1959. The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research.” Journal of Political Economy.
O’Connor. 2023. Modelling Scientific Communities.
O’Connor, Goldberg, and Goldman. 2024. Social Epistemology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
O’Connor, and Weatherall. 2017. Scientific Polarization.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science.
———. 2021. Modeling How False Beliefs Spread.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology.
Patterson, and Williams. 2005. Maintaining Research Traditions on Place: Diversity of Thought and Scientific Progress.” Journal of Environmental Psychology.
Pavitt. 1991. What Makes Basic Research Economically Useful? Research Policy.
Piekarski. 2021. Understanding Predictive Processing. A Review.” AVANT. Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej.
Ritchie. 2020. Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth.
Rubin, and Schneider. 2021. Priority and Privilege in Scientific Discovery.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Šešelja. 2022. Agent‐based Models of Scientific Interaction.” Philosophy Compass.
Smith. 2022. The Internet Is Not What You Think It Is: A History, a Philosophy, a Warning.
Thagard. 1993. “Societies of Minds: Science as Distributed Computing.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
———. 1997. “Collaborative Knowledge.” Noûs.
———. 2005. “How to Be a Successful Scientist.” Scientific and Technological Thinking.
———. 2007. Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge.” Philosophy of Science.
Weatherall, O’Connor, and Bruner. 2018. How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policy Makers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks.”
Williams. 2021a. Epistemic Irrationality in the Bayesian Brain.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
———. 2021b. Socially Adaptive Belief.” Mind & Language.
———. 2021c. Motivated Ignorance, Rationality, and Democratic Politics.” Synthese.
———. 2022. Signalling, Commitment, and Strategic Absurdities.” Mind and Language.
———. 2023. The Case for Partisan Motivated Reasoning.”
Wolpert, and Harper. 2025. The Computational Power of a Human Society: A New Model of Social Evolution.”
Wolpert, and Kinney. 2023. Stochastic Mathematical Systems.”
———. 2024. A Stochastic Model of Mathematics and Science.” Foundations of Physics.
Yin, Dong, Wang, et al. 2021. Science as a Public Good: Public Use and Funding of Science.” Working Paper. Working Paper Series.