Actuarial bread-and-butter. The mathematical study of measuring the chances of something terrible happening. This is usually a financial risk, but can also be extreme weather conditions, earthquakes, whatever.
This usage of risk is distinct from the “risk” in “statistical risk bounds”, which is the domain of statistical learning theory. He we are talking about probabilities that things are going to go wrong, rather than expected badness of an estimate over some class of functions.
How do you evaluate how bad the worst cases are when deciding whether to do something? Generally, this involves ignoring how good the best scenario is; Given financial history, probably that’s the niche to worry about filling. How do you trade off the badness and likelihood of the bad cases? This is about the risk measures themselves. For a useful class of distributions to use in this context, it might be worth considering extreme value theory.
🏗 introduce risk coherence, and Discuss application to climate risk, and scheduling.
Value-at-Risk
is a random variable, the payoff of a portfolio at some future time, and our quantile of interest is .
The of an asset with cdf is, up to minus signs, an estimate of the icdf. It is defined as
Expected shortfall
“the expected loss of portfolio value given that a loss is occurring at or above the -quantile.”
The expected shortfall (ES) is defined
where VaR is Value At Risk, and where
It is also known as the Conditional Value-at-Risk,
According to Wikipedia, I might care about the dual representation, with the set of probability measures absolutely continuous with respect to the physical measure , such that almost surely.
…Why might I care about that again?
Subadditivity/coherence
TBC
G-expectation
I don’t understand this yet, but Shige Peng just gave a talk wherein he argued that the generalised, sublinear expectation operator derived from distributional uncertainty generates coherent risk measures, although it is not immediately obvious to me how this works. See, e.g. Shige Peng (2004).
Sensitivity to parameters of risk measures
SWIM is a method for analysis of sensitivity for parameter assumptions in risk measures. (R package) I might use this article as a point of entry to this field if I need it.
An efficient sensitivity analysis for stochastic models based on Monte Carlo samples. Provides weights on simulated scenarios from a stochastic model, such that stressed random variables fulfil given probabilistic constraints (e.g. specified values for risk measures), under the new scenario weights. Scenario weights are selected by constrained minimisation of the relative entropy to the baseline model.
References
Ackerman. 2017. Worst-Case Economics: Extreme Events in Climate and Finance.
Artzner, Delbaen, Eber, et al. 1999.
“Coherent Measures of Risk.” Mathematical Finance.
Cai, and Wang. 2008.
“Nonparametric Estimation of Conditional VaR and Expected Shortfall.” Journal of Econometrics, Econometric modelling in finance and risk management: An overview,.
Charpentier, Barry, and James. 2021.
“Insurance Against Natural Catastrophes: Balancing Actuarial Fairness and Social Solidarity.” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice.
Charpentier, and Flachaire. 2019.
“Pareto Models for Risk Management.” arXiv:1912.11736 [Econ, Stat].
Chen, Song Xi. 2008.
“Nonparametric Estimation of Expected Shortfall.” Journal of Financial Econometrics.
Chen, Zengjing, Chen, and Davison. 2005.
“Choquet Expectation and Peng’s g -Expectation.” The Annals of Probability.
Elliott, and Golub. 2022.
“Networks and Economic Fragility.” Annual Review of Economics.
Fishburn. 1977. “Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns.” American Economic Review.
Freedman, and Stark. 2009.
“What Is the Chance of an Earthquake?” In
Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue with the Social Sciences.
Gnecco, Meinshausen, Peters, et al. 2021.
“Causal Discovery in Heavy-Tailed Models.” The Annals of Statistics.
Hubbard. 2014. How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business.
Hudson, Botzen, Czajkowski, et al. 2014. “Risk Selection and Moral Hazard in Natural Disaster Insurance Markets: Empirical Evidence from Germany and the United States.”
Kaplan, Stanley, and Garrick. 1981.
“On the Quantitative Definition of Risk.” Risk Analysis.
Kaplan, E. L., and Meier. 1958.
“Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations.” Journal of the American Statistical Association.
Marcelo G. Cruz. 2002. Modeling, Measuring and Hedging Operational Risk.
McNeil, Frey, and Embrechts. 2005. Quantitative Risk Management : Concepts, Techniques and Tools.
Nolde, and Zhou. 2021.
“Extreme Value Analysis for Financial Risk Management.” Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.
Ou-Yang, Kunreuther, and Michel-Kerjan. 2013.
“An Economic Analysis of Climate Adaptations to Hurricane Risk in St. Lucia.” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice.
Peng, Shige. 2004.
“Nonlinear Expectations, Nonlinear Evaluations and Risk Measures.” In
Stochastic Methods in Finance. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1856.
Pesenti, Millossovich, and Tsanakas. 2019.
“Reverse Sensitivity Testing: What Does It Take to Break the Model?” European Journal of Operational Research.
Rakhlin, Panchenko, and Mukherjee. 2005.
“Risk Bounds for Mixture Density Estimation.” ESAIM: Probability and Statistics.
Rosazza Gianin. 2006.
“Risk Measures via -Expectations.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics.
Scandroglio, Gori, Vaccaro, et al. 2013.
“Estimating VaR and ES of the Spot Price of Oil Using Futures-Varying Centiles.” International Journal of Financial Engineering and Risk Management.
Vázquez, Oliveira, Dezsö, et al. 2006.
“Modeling Bursts and Heavy Tails in Human Dynamics.” Physical Review E.