Content warning:

Comparison of groups here by their structural similarities is not to imply moral equivalence or endorsement of said groups. Groups you like and groups who offend you might both have similar dynamics.

Superorganisms are organisms made of other organisms. Since what an organism is is not always clear, there is a lot of room for interpretation (are all eukaryotic cells superorganisms because of their mitochondria?)

If we call something a superorganism, we are assuming its component parts are not so tightly coupled as an uncontroversial, singular organism.

If some collective is going to survive and propagate in the noisy substrate of humanity, it needs strategies to replicate, adapt, and regulate, just like any singular organism, but with parts that are human.

See also Subculture dynamics, tribalism, group dynamics, memetics, instiutions, moral orbits, moral wetware

More generally we might consider the organism ↔︎ superorganism relationship as only one run on a ladder of such relationships, e.g between organisms below me (cells) and above me (societies).

1 Egregores

I like the notion of egregores, which model human dynamics as organisms, in a usefully loose sense. “Hypothetical self-maintaining human systems.”

We can speculate what such superorganisms would entail, e.g. Sarah Perry, in Weaponized Sacredness:

A smart [egregore] would keep its component humans in the zone of maximum productivity, not demanding too much from them, nor allowing them to slack off (producing nothing for the glory and amusement of the egregore and anyway perhaps feeling bored and useless).

I like this metaphor, as it inspires us to think about what the feedback systems that are in place are configured to do.

I wonder if we might model these as moral orbits. Or as AIs.

Figure 1

2 Status

Kevin Simler in Minimum Viable Superorganism, casts the problem of cooperation outside the family unit as built upon status.

3 Strictness

Iannaccone ():

The strength of strict churches is neither a historical coicidence nor a statiscal artifact. Strictness makes organizations stronger an more attractive because it reduces free riding. It screens out members who lack commitment and and stimulates participation among those who remain. Rational choice theory thus explains the success of sect, cults, and conservative denominations without recourse to assumptions of irrationality, abnormality, or misinformation. The theory also predicts differences between strict and lenient groups, distinguishes between effective and counterproductive demands, and demonstrates the need to adapt strict demands in response to social change.

4 Incoming

5 References

Ataöv. 1998. Narcissism of Minor Differences: Nurturing the ‘Clash of Civilizations’.” In.
Baldassarri, and Grossman. 2013. The Effect of Group Attachment and Social Position on Prosocial Behavior. Evidence from Lab-in-the-Field Experiments.” Edited by Angel Sánchez. PLoS ONE.
Bernhard, Fischbacher, and Fehr. 2006. Parochial altruism in humans.” Nature.
Bowles. 2001. Individual Interactions, Group Conflicts, and the Evolution of Preferences.” Social Dynamics.
Bowles, Choi, and Hopfensitz. 2003. The Co-Evolution of Individual Behaviors and Social Institutions.” Journal of Theoretical Biology.
Bowles, and Gintis. 2004. The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations.” Theoretical Population Biology.
Boyd, and Richerson. 1992. Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizable Groups.” Ethology and Sociobiology.
Boyd, and Richerson. 1999. “Complex Societies: The Evolutionary Origins of a Crude Superorganism.” Human Nature.
Dunbar. 1993. Coevolution of Neocortex Size, Group Size and Language in Humans.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Ehrlich, and Levin. 2005. “The Evolution of Norms.” PloS Biology.
Feinberg, Willer, and Schultz. 2014. Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups.” Psychological Science.
Fu, and Wang. 2008. Coevolutionary Dynamics of Opinions and Networks: From Diversity to Uniformity.” Physical Review E.
Gintis, Smith, and Bowles. 2001. Costly Signaling and Cooperation.” Journal of Theoretical Biology.
Gordon. 2014. The Ecology of Collective Behavior.” PLoS Biol.
Goswami. 2020. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities (1983).” Public Culture.
Gould. 2002. The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test.” American Journal of Sociology.
Hagens. 2020. Economics for the Future – Beyond the Superorganism.” Ecological Economics.
Henrich, and Boyd. 1998. The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences.” Evolution and Human Behavior.
Horst, Kirman, and Teschl. 2007. Changing Identity: The Emergence of Social Groups.” Economics Working Paper 0078.
Iannaccone. 1994. Why Strict Churches Are Strong.” American Journal of Sociology.
Kawakatsu, Chodrow, Eikmeier, et al. 2021. Emergence of Hierarchy in Networked Endorsement Dynamics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
Klug, and Bagrow. 2016. Understanding the Group Dynamics and Success of Teams.” Royal Society Open Science.
Lena. 2012. Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music.
Maner. 2017. Dominance and Prestige: A Tale of Two Hierarchies.” Current Directions in Psychological Science.
Marx. 2022. Status and Culture: How Our Desire for Higher Social Rank Shapes Identity, Fosters Creativity, and Changes the World.
Mead, and Maner. 2012. When Me Versus You Becomes Us Versus Them: How Intergroup Competition Shapes Ingroup Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass.
Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. 2006.
Nowak. 2006. Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation.” Science.
Pavlogiannis, Tkadlec, Chatterjee, et al. 2018. Construction of Arbitrarily Strong Amplifiers of Natural Selection Using Evolutionary Graph Theory.” Communications Biology.
Pinker. 2025. When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows…: Common Knowledge and the Science of Harmony, Hypocrisy and Outrage.
Rao. 2005. Symbolic Public Goods and the Coordination of Collective Action: A Comparison of Local Development in India and Indonesia.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
Richerson, Boyd, and Henrich. 2003. “Cultural Evolution of Human Cooperation.” Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation.
Singh, Acerbi, Caldwell, et al. 2021. Beyond Social Learning.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
Smith, and Kirby. 2008. Cultural Evolution: Implications for Understanding the Human Language Faculty and Its Evolution.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
Tajfel. 1982. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology.