Subculture dynamics

Egregores, superorganisms, memeplexes, coalitions, scenes, fandoms, subcultures, normies, hipsters, sects, and tribes at scale



⚠️ Content warning ⚠️

Comparison of groups here by their structural similarities is not to imply moral equivalence or endorsement of said groups. Groups you like and groups who offend you might both have similar dynamics, and that will be made explicit here.

Many group dynamics things feel like we could handle them from a higher level of coarse graining. Here are some useful tools for thinking about how groups form an maintain themselves.

Red-queen signalling + genres + group dynamics intersect in the dynamics of scenes and subcultures. Also memetics.

Egregores

Sarah Perry, in Weaponized Sacredness, almost describes this as a control problem, when she discusses Egregores:

A smart [egregore] would keep its component humans in the zone of maximum productivity, not demanding too much from them, nor allowing them to slack off (producing nothing for the glory and amusement of the egregore and anyway perhaps feeling bored and useless).

I like this metaphor, as it inspires us to think about what the feedback systems that are in place are configured to do.

Voice and exit and adverse selection

Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Dowding 2016; Hirschman 1970) is an interesting lense to examine about people’s use of movements and identities. TODO: examine in the context of schumpeterian creative destruction, and of adverse selection of who remains in a category.

Warrens, Plazas and the Edge of Legibility addresses The Evaporative Cooling Effect.

Communities of last resort

DRMacIver: Ladders between communities discusses this, and I think it is worth thinking about under the banner of emancipating my tribe.

Fostered by the internet

Thou Profoundest Hell - Adam Elkus

If you want to make a certain kind of impressionable person miserable for life, you give them something that will make them feel superior to others without actually raising their status in the world. The cognitive dissonance of feeling better than the “phonies” but watching the phonies thrive is a recipe for wild mood swings, self-loathing, and raw toxicity. Welcome to hell. A hell mostly of one’s own making, but nonetheless as punishing and painful as anything out of Milton or Dante. And like a lot of things these days, the portal to this nightmarish dimension is the Internet.

[This place] fits a general pattern that is, unfortunately, discernible in specialist communities that flock to particular consumer products, political movements, technical tools, and many other similar things. People watching these communities will often be astonished by the way they move almost seamlessly from arrogant euphoria to deep and dark depression. Every victory is a decisive rout, every defeat is proof that the world is ending. …

This place merges the elitism and snobbery of Tarver’s Lisp hackers with the parochialism of rural villages. The people with optionality start to trickle off, and the people who remain are true believers and those who have no future outside the community. The dead-enders alternate between repeated collective rageouts against the external world and internal infighting. Initially the anger, frustration, and gloom is directed towards the outside world. Then inevitably the internal backbiting begins once “our tribe against the world” fails to become a unifying device that staves off the internal entropy building inside the community.

It is both intensely cynical and intensely romantic. It often suspects the worst about the “normies” but nonetheless at least subconsciously craves their approval. It sees the world as a hollow, desiccated shell but nonetheless has a childish faith somehow in particular objects of fixation and aesthetic attitudes. It is a machine for generating not only self-doubt but also self-fulfilling prophecies of rejection. And it comes equipped with the convenient fallback of “I never wanted your love anyway!” when rejection, in fact, occurs. Even if this fallback may not really express what is actually desired at heart. At the end of the day, it manages these contradictions by eschewing practical action in favor of elaborate expressive displays.

Subcultures of note

  • Social Justice. e.g. Emma Sarappo, How Tumblr Taught Social Justice to a Generation of Teenagers.

  • Queer rap

  • MRAs

  • Mark Greif, 2010, what was the hipster?:

    Indeed, the White Hipster—the style that suddenly emerged in 1999—inverted Broyard’s model to particularly unpleasant effect. Let me recall a string of keywords: trucker hats; undershirts called “wifebeaters,” worn alone; the aesthetic of basement rec-room pornography, flash-lit Polaroids, and fake-wood paneling; Pabst Blue Ribbon; “porno” or “pedophile” mustaches; aviator glasses; Americana T-shirts from church socials and pig roasts; tube socks; the late albums of Johnny Cash; tattoos.…

    These were the most visible emblems of a small and surprising subculture, where the source of a priori knowledge seemed to be nostalgia for suburban whiteness. As the White Negro had once fetishized blackness, the White Hipster fetishized the violence, instinctiveness, and rebelliousness of lower-middle-class “white trash.”

    Hm.

Contrarian dynamics

Barber pole dynamics, early adopters, etc. See Red-queen signalling, stroppiness.

Norms within

TBD

Aesthetics of

See timeless works of art.

Incoming

Gwern, The Melancholy of Subculture Society has a festival of this kind of thing in the footnotes. Segmentation faults: how machine learning trains us to appear insane to one another.

A Cyclic Theory Of Subcultures

David Chapman’s Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths In Subculture Evolution is rightfully a classic, but it doesn’t match my own experience. Either through good luck or poor observational skills, I’ve never seen a lot of sociopath takeovers. Instead, I’ve seen a gradual process of declining asabiyyah. Good people start out working together, then work together a little less, then turn on each other, all while staying good people and thinking they alone embody the true spirit of the movement.

I find Peter Turchin’s theories of civilizational cycles oddly helpful here, maybe moreso than for civilizations themselves.

References

Aziz, Haris, and Florian Brandl. 2012. Existence of Stability in Hedonic Coalition Formation Games.” arXiv.
Baldassarri, Delia, and Guy Grossman. 2013. The Effect of Group Attachment and Social Position on Prosocial Behavior. Evidence from Lab-in-the-Field Experiments.” Edited by Angel Sánchez. PLoS ONE 8 (3): e58750.
Baron, Robert S. 2005. So Right It’s Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37:219–53. Academic Press.
Baronchelli, Andrea, Tao Gong, Andrea Puglisi, and Vittorio Loreto. 2010. Modeling the emergence of universality in color naming patterns.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (6): 2403–7.
Bergh, Jeroen C J M van den, and John M Gowdy. 2009. A Group Selection Perspective on Economic Behavior, Institutions and Organizations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72 (1): 1–20.
Bergstrom, Theodore C. 2002. Evolution of Social Behavior: Individual and Group Selection.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16: 67–88.
Bowles, Samuel. 2001. Individual Interactions, Group Conflicts, and the Evolution of Preferences.” Social Dynamics 155: 190.
Bowles, Samuel, Jung-Kyoo Choi, and Astrid Hopfensitz. 2003. The Co-Evolution of Individual Behaviors and Social Institutions.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 223 (2): 135–47.
Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. 1992. Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizable Groups.” Ethology and Sociobiology 13 (3): 171–95.
Brandt, Felix, and Martin Bullinger. 2020. “Finding and Recognizing Popular Coalition Structures.” In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 195–203. AAMAS ’20. Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
———. 2022. Finding and Recognizing Popular Coalition Structures.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 74 (June): 569–626.
Branwen, Gwern. 2009. The Melancholy of Subculture Society,” January.
Cancho, Ramon Ferrer i, and Ricard V. Solé. 2003. Least Effort and the Origins of Scaling in Human Language.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (3): 788–91.
Cattani, Gino, and Simone Ferriani. 2008. A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry.” Organization Science 19 (6): 824–44.
Cheng, Joey T., Jessica L. Tracy, and Joseph Henrich. 2010. Pride, Personality, and the Evolutionary Foundations of Human Social Status.” Evolution and Human Behavior 31 (5): 334–47.
Chong, Dennis. 1991. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. American Politics and Political Economy Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chu, Johan S. G., and James A. Evans. 2021. Slowed Canonical Progress in Large Fields of Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (41): e2021636118.
Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press.
Cooley, Erin, Jazmin L. Brown-Iannuzzi, Ryan F. Lei, William Cipolli III, and Lauren E. Philbrook. 20210422. The Policy Implications of Feeling Relatively Low Versus High Status Within a Privileged Group. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 150 (11): 2346.
Couzin, Iain D., Christos C. Ioannou, Güven Demirel, Thilo Gross, Colin J. Torney, Andrew Hartnett, Larissa Conradt, Simon A. Levin, and Naomi E. Leonard. 2011. Uninformed Individuals Promote Democratic Consensus in Animal Groups.” Science 334 (6062): 1578–80.
DeDeo, Simon, and Elizabeth A. Hobson. 2021. From Equality to Hierarchy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (21): e2106186118.
Dowding, Keith. 2016. Albert O. Hirschman, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.” In Albert O. Hirschman, edited by Martin Lodge, Edward C. Page, and Steven J. Balla. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.
Dunbar, Robin I M. 1993. Coevolution of Neocortex Size, Group Size and Language in Humans.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4): 681–94.
Ehrlich, Paul R, and Simon A Levin. 2005. “The Evolution of Norms.” PloS Biology 3: –194.
Feinberg, Matthew, Robb Willer, and Michael Schultz. 2014. Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups.” Psychological Science 25 (3): 656–64.
Feinberg, Matthew, Robb Willer, Jennifer Stellar, and Dacher Keltner. 2012. The virtues of gossip: reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (5): 1015–30.
Fu, Feng, and Long Wang. 2008. Coevolutionary Dynamics of Opinions and Networks: From Diversity to Uniformity.” Physical Review E 78 (1): 016104.
Gordon, Deborah M. 2014. The Ecology of Collective Behavior.” PLoS Biol 12 (3): e1001805.
Goswami, Manu. 2020. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities (1983).” Public Culture 32 (2 (91)): 441–48.
Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Michael Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson, and Russell D. Gray. 2017. Evolutionary Dynamics of Language Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (42): E8822–29.
Hardin, Russell. 1982. Collective Action. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hauert, Christoph, Silvia De Monte, Josef Hofbauer, and Karl Sigmund. 2002. Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods Games.” Science 296 (5570): 1129–32.
Henrich, Joseph, and Robert Boyd. 1998. The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences.” Evolution and Human Behavior 19 (4): 215–41.
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press.
Horst, Ulrich, Alan Kirman, and Miriam Teschl. 2007. Changing Identity: The Emergence of Social Groups.” Economics Working Paper 0078. Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
Kawakatsu, Mari, Philip S. Chodrow, Nicole Eikmeier, and Daniel B. Larremore. 2021. Emergence of Hierarchy in Networked Endorsement Dynamics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (16): e2015188118.
Klug, Michael, and James P. Bagrow. 2016. Understanding the Group Dynamics and Success of Teams.” Royal Society Open Science 3 (4).
Lena, Jennifer C. 2012. Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Loreto, Vittorio, Animesh Mukherjee, and Francesca Tria. 2012. On the Origin of the Hierarchy of Color Names.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (18): 6819–24.
Maner, Jon K. 2017. Dominance and Prestige: A Tale of Two Hierarchies.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (6): 526–31.
Marx, W. David. 2022. Status and Culture: How Our Desire for Higher Social Rank Shapes Identity, Fosters Creativity, and Changes the World. New York, NY: Viking.
Mäs, Michael, Andreas Flache, Károly Takács, and Karen A. Jehn. 2013. In the Short Term We Divide, in the Long Term We Unite: Demographic Crisscrossing and the Effects of Faultlines on Subgroup Polarization.” Organization Science 24 (3): 716–36.
Nowak, Martin A. 2006. Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 314 (5805): 1560–63.
Olson, Mancur. 2009. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Vol. 124. Harvard University Press.
Pavlogiannis, Andreas, Josef Tkadlec, Krishnendu Chatterjee, and Martin A. Nowak. 2018. Construction of Arbitrarily Strong Amplifiers of Natural Selection Using Evolutionary Graph Theory.” Communications Biology 1 (1): 1–8.
Petersson, Karl-Magnus, Vasiliki Folia, and Peter Hagoort. 2012. What Artificial Grammar Learning Reveals about the Neurobiology of Syntax.” Brain and Language, The Neurobiology of Syntax, 120 (2): 83–95.
Post, Daniel J. van der, Mathias Franz, and Kevin N. Laland. 2016. Skill Learning and the Evolution of Social Learning Mechanisms.” BMC Evolutionary Biology 16 (1): 166.
Rao, Vijayendra. 2005. Symbolic Public Goods and the Coordination of Collective Action: A Comparison of Local Development in India and Indonesia.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 3685.
Saavedra, Serguei, Janet Efstathiou, and Felix Reed-Tsochas. 2007. Identifying the Underlying Structure and Dynamic Interactions in a Voting Network.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 377 (2): 672–88.
Smith, Kenny, and Simon Kirby. 2008. Cultural Evolution: Implications for Understanding the Human Language Faculty and Its Evolution.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 3591–3603.
Trouche, Emmanuel, Emmanuel Sander, and Hugo Mercier. 2014. Arguments, More Than Confidence, Explain the Good Performance of Reasoning Groups.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2431710. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Young, H. Peyton. 2011. The Dynamics of Social Innovation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (Supplement 4): 21285–91.

No comments yet. Why not leave one?

GitHub-flavored Markdown & a sane subset of HTML is supported.