Background: The selection, development, or comparison of machine learning methods in data mining can be a difficult task based on the target problem and goals of a particular study. Numerous publicly available real-world and simulated benchmark datasets have emerged from different sources, but their organization and adoption as standards have been inconsistent. As such, selecting and curating specific benchmarks remains an unnecessary burden on machine learning practitioners and data scientists.
Results: The present study introduces an accessible, curated, and developing public benchmark resource to facilitate identification of the strengths and weaknesses of different machine learning methodologies. We compare meta-features among the current set of benchmark datasets in this resource to characterize the diversity of available data. Finally, we apply a number of established machine learning methods to the entire benchmark suite and analyze how datasets and algorithms cluster in terms of performance. From this study, we find that existing benchmarks lack the diversity to properly benchmark machine learning algorithms, and there are several gaps in benchmarking problems that still need to be considered.
Have used this one; it is very convenient for generic benchmarking stuff.
- Source at EpistasisLab/pmlb.
Rdatasets collates all the most popular R datasets
Official statistics! Usually a dog’s breakfast in format, but interesting in content. SNStatComp/awesome-official-statistics-software: An awesome list of statistical software for creating and accessing official statistics
Zenodo is similar. Backed by CERN, on their infrastructure. Hosts many published scientific data sets. Discovery is not great through Zenodo itself, but if you read an interesting paper…
IEEE Dataport is free for IEEE members and happily hosts 2TB datasets. It gives you a DOI and integrates with many IEEE publications, plus allows convenient access from the Amazon cloud via AWS, which might be where your data is anyway. However, they charge USD2000 for an open access version, and otherwise only other IEEE dataport users can get at your data. I know this is not an unusual way for access to journal articles to work, but for data sets it feels like a ham-fisted way of enforcing scarcity. Not to undercut my own professional society here, but if you can do without a DOI, I will happily upload your data for AWS for you for, say, USD1500, which will pay for 2 lucrative hours of my time.
Nuit Blanche’s listing of data sets is handy if you want some good inverse-problem signal processing challenges.
The Seshat Global History Databank brings together the most current and comprehensive body of knowledge about human history in one place. Our unique Databank systematically collects what is currently known about the social and political organization of human societies and how civilizations have evolved over time.
Quandl provides some databases.
Torrent technology allows a group of editors to “seed” their own peer-reviewed published articles with just a torrent client. Each editor can have part or all of the papers stored on their desktops and have a torrent tracker to coordinate the delivery of papers without a dedicated server.
One aim of this site is to create the infrastructure to allow open access journals to operate at low cost. By facilitating file transfers, the journal can focus on its core mission of providing world class research. After peer review the paper can be indexed on this site and disseminated throughout our system.
Large dataset delivery can be supported by researchers in the field that have the dataset on their machine. A popular large dataset doesn’t need to be housed centrally. Researchers can have part of the dataset they are working on and they can help host it together.
Libraries can host this data to host papers from their own campus without becoming the only source of the data. So even if a library’s system is broken other universities can participate in getting that data into the hands of researchers.
prodigy is an interactive dataset annotator for training classifiers
Various cloud compute providers host data sets conveniently close to their cloud platforms which minimises data movement costs
Datasets about Australia
See Australia in data.
- Mcompetitions/M4-methods: Data, Benchmarks, and methods submitted to the M4 forecasting competition
- Mcompetitions/M5-methods: Data, Benchmarks, and methods submitted to the M5 forecasting competition
- Mcompetitions/M6-methods: Data, Benchmarks, and methods submitted to the M6 forecasting competition
Here are some background links for perspective on these
- M4 Dataset | Papers With Code
- The M5 Competition – MOFC
- M4 Forecasting Competition | Rob J Hyndman
- M4 – MOFC
See also forecasting.
3d sensor data
Stashed at 3D data.
Generic tools for construction thereof
The Engauge Digitizer tool accepts image files (like PNG, JPEG and TIFF) containing graphs, and recovers the data points from those graphs. The resulting data points are usually used as input to other software applications. Conceptually, Engauge Digitizer is the opposite of a graphing tool that converts data points to graphs. [..] an image file is imported, digitized within Engauge, and exported as a table of numeric data to a text file.
(They mean graph in the sense of plot, not in the sense of network.)
Every time you say, about this data set, “this really puts the ‘cloud’ in ‘cloud computing’” a meteorologist comes over to your desk and slaps you.↩︎