Red queen social signal dynamics

Arms races in memetic selection on graphs is how I make my fashion choices

2018-12-18 – 2021-02-27
Maybe related 🤷:

Signalling games, subcultures, slang, El Farol Bars, anti-inductive systems, glass bead games, fake martial arts, level of simulacra, genre speciation, as transmitted on the social information graph …

Note salad

Question: Is this a dig a Yudkowsky?

Robin Hanson argues against irony for being outgroup-exclusionary. I don’t think blanket discouraging irony is plausible or desirable, but… the insight is useful. It is important to remember that indicators of in-group membership, such as irony, are shibboleths, not indicators of quality.

This one is interesting not because it is not one of Hanson’s best ideas, IMO. I like it as a trial balloon for some better ideas that do not conflate local culture with hostility to wider culture, or assume the plausibilty of operating without in-groups.

David Chapman’s Geeks, MOPs and Sociopaths model, explains subcultural dynamics as a business model, looking at how fun things become mass market things.

The Phatic and the anti-inductive.

Douglas Adams once said there was a theory that if anyone ever understood the Universe, it would disappear and be replaced by something even more incomprehensible. He added that there was another theory that this had already happened.

These sorts of things — things such that if you understand them, they get more complicated until you don’t — are called “anti-inductive”.

Right is the new Left. Metacontrarianism. Nice things:

But what, then, in such a place, is nice? Is nice now an aesthetic, a style, rather than a substance? And hence, is it the aesthetic of having the aesthetic? Has the thing been banished by the symbolic representation of the thing? Does this tyranny of superficial niceness inevitably create a particular ideological cascade? It seems to. Does it banish truth, slowly pressuring all into conformity, via the Scott Alexander quote that cannot be repeated enough times, so here it is again:

Sometimes I can almost feel this happening. First I believe something is true, and say so. Then I realize it’s considered low-status and cringeworthy. Then I make a principled decision to avoid saying it — or say it only in a very careful way — in order to protect my reputation and ability to participate in society. Then when other people say it, I start looking down on them for being bad at public relations. Then I start looking down on them just for being low-status or cringeworthy. Finally the idea of “low-status” and “bad and wrong” have merged so fully in my mind that the idea seems terrible and ridiculous to me, and I only remember it’s true if I force myself to explicitly consider the question. And even then, it’s in a condescending way, where I feel like the people who say it’s true deserve low status for not being smart enough to remember not to say it. This is endemic, and I try to quash it when I notice it, but I don’t know how many times it’s slipped my notice all the way to the point where I can no longer remember the truth of the original statement.

Explaining those odd terms the alt-right use to troll their opponents, and complaints about virtue signallers as virtue signalling.

When I have a moment I would like to muster some thoughts about how in-group and outgroup signals like these are weaponised in practice, and the types of coordinations that are robust for society.

Closer to home, consider “Political correctness” accusations are always explosive at family dinner. 🏗

Meme dynamics

see memetics.

Martial arts

Fake Martial Arts, A Disorientation

However, even fighters who enjoy making fun of fake martial arts in the “not useful for MMA” sense are still quick to admit that all martial arts are largely fake […]. Ramsey Dewey in particular enjoys demonstrating the fallacy of trying to fight off multiple opponents, or a single opponent with a knife, as opposed to employing wiser (but not useful for MMA!) strategies like diplomacy, going armed, making better life choices, and running the fuck away.…

I have been wondering if there are intellectual equivalents of fake martial arts. The highly ritualized and hierarchical culture of the legal courtroom is one example of how epistemic battles are rendered civilized, and in some ways less real. Yet one can’t deny that legal systems are having a genuine and ongoing encounter with reality, from top to bottom. They are embedded in reality. Their fakenesses serve realities on other levels.

In consumer design

Self-proclaimed premium mediocre intellectual Venkatesh Rao defines premium mediocre:

Premium mediocre is the finest bottle of wine at Olive Garden. Premium mediocre is cupcakes and froyo. Premium mediocre is “truffle” oil on anything […], and extra-leg-room seats in Economy. Premium mediocre is cruise ships, artisan pizza, Game of Thrones, and The Bellagio.

Premium mediocre is food that Instagrams better than it tastes.

Adil Majid thinks it though with a little more precision.

A related concept might be bugman technology. Caveat: that term has snide connotations rooted in romantic struggle against a corporate feminism surveillance complex. This movement (?) does not seem to me to have a compelling diagnosis of the world’s ills.

References

Bentley, R Alexander, Paul Ormerod, and Michael Batty. 2011. “Evolving Social Influence in Large Populations.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65 (3): 537–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1102-1.
Bentley, R Alexander, Paul Ormerod, and Stephen Shennan. 2011. “Population-Level Neutral Model Already Explains Linguistic Patterns.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278 (1713): 1770–72. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2581.
Bowles, Samuel, Jung-Kyoo Choi, and Astrid Hopfensitz. 2003. “The Co-Evolution of Individual Behaviors and Social Institutions.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 223 (2): 135–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00060-2.
Bowles, Samuel, and Herbert Gintis. 2004. “The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations.” Theoretical Population Biology 65 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2003.07.001.
Cattani, Gino, and Simone Ferriani. 2008. “A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry.” Organization Science 19 (6): 824–44. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0350.
Coscia, Michele. 2017. “Popularity Spikes Hurt Future Chances for Viral Propagation of Protomemes.” Communications of the ACM 61 (1): 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3158227.
Ehrlich, Paul R, and Simon A Levin. 2005. “The Evolution of Norms.” PloS Biology 3: –194.
Feltovich, Nick, Richmond Harbaugh, and Ted To. 2002. “Too Cool for School? Signalling and Countersignalling.” RAND Journal of Economics, 630–49. https://kelley.iu.edu/riharbau/cs-randfinal.pdf.
Fu, Feng, and Long Wang. 2008. “Coevolutionary Dynamics of Opinions and Networks: From Diversity to Uniformity.” Physical Review E 78 (1): 016104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.016104.
Galam, S. 2008. “Sociophysics: A Review of Galam Models.” International Journal of Modern Physics C 19. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183108012297.
Gintis, Herbert, Eric Smith, and Samuel Bowles. 2001. “Costly Signaling and Cooperation.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 213 (1): 103–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2406.
Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Michael Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson, and Russell D. Gray. 2017. “Evolutionary Dynamics of Language Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (42): E8822–29. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700388114.
Oliver, J. Eric, and Thomas J. Wood. 2014. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 952–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084.
Ormerod, Paul. 2006. “Hayek, the Intellectuals and Socialism, and Weighted Scale-Free Networks.” Economic Affairs 26: 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2006.00611.x.
Ormerod, Paul, and R Alexander Bentley. 2010. “Modelling Creative Innovation.” Cultural Science 3 (1).
Saavedra, Serguei, Janet Efstathiou, and Felix Reed-Tsochas. 2007. “Identifying the Underlying Structure and Dynamic Interactions in a Voting Network.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 377 (2): 672–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.11.038.
Saavedra, Serguei, Felix Reed-Tsochas, and Brian Uzzi. 2009. “A Simple Model of Bipartite Cooperation for Ecological and Organizational Networks.” Nature 457 (7228): 463–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07532.
Sloman, Steven A., and Philip Fernbach. 2017. The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone. New York: Riverhead Books.
Softky, William, and Criscillia Benford. 2017. “Sensory Metrics of Neuromechanical Trust.” Neural Computation 29 (9): 2293–2351. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_00988.
Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010.
———. 2002. “Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets.” American Economic Review 92: 434–59. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136200.