Designing social movements

Synthetic biology for utopian egregores

⚠️ Content warning ⚠️

Comparison of groups here by their structural similarities is not to imply moral equivalence or endorsement of said groups. Groups you like and groups who offend you might both have similar dynamics, and that will be made explicit here.

On the theory of designing the precepts of self-replicating social groups. Important in “community stewardship”. Probably uses tools from institutions, social norms etc.

To discuss: Bay area rationalists, the Marrickville Warehouse Alliance, weirdo Honduran charter cities, every Schelling model, (de-)radicalization pathways…

Action manuals

See community maintenance.

On social norms

See social norms.

On governance and accountability

See community governance.

On non-monetary economies

Governance of community as governance of (some real or imagined) commons.

Status within

See status for now. Later return to the idea of multiple hierarchies in The Melancholy of Subculture Society footnotes.

OODA loops in movements


Chesterton’s norms

Why do we do it that way? 🏗️


Pavlogiannis et al. (2018)


Why Woke Organizations All Sound the Same: This is a criticism of social justice agendas, but it is also a laundry list of theory-of-change ideas for persuading institutions to implement your preferred agenda, whether it be socially just or socially unjust.

Marginalized and marginalising

Fascinating parallels in outgroups and mobilisation against other outgroups: Katie J. M. Baker on a lady equivalent of the manosphere: Mumsnet

The more I learned about Mumsnet, the more the forum reminded me of my past reporting on the ways men are radicalized by the toxic online “manosphere,” where pick-up artists (PUAs) and men’s rights activists (MRAs) recruit followers by exploiting real fears (such as economic anxiety) and blaming marginalized outgroups (women, people of color, Jews) for societal failures. As people get drawn into these communities, they become obsessed with a misguided sense of victimization and start to focus single-mindedly on their newfound worldview.

It seemed to me that was exactly what was happening on Mumsnet: some of these newly “gender critical” Mumsnetters were relatively privileged women who had never felt marginalized until they gave birth and came to feel isolated in their nuclear households and (rightfully!) outraged at the lack of support for mothers in the U.K. They turned to Mumsnet for solidarity, and somehow became fixated on trans women in the process

I take issue with some of the analyses in this article, of both Mumsnet and the MRAs, but the general thesis about the similarity in recruiting, onboarding and mobilising dynamics is interesting.

Movements For Good People

Over at institutions for angels I muse about movement design that presupposes its members are good.

We may recruit the worst people

David Rosenthal on Cryptocurrencies argues

Libertarianism’s attraction is based on ignoring externalities, and cryptocurrencies are no exception.

Zing. All ideologies face a disjunct between of what their core theorists advocate and what their recruiting implicitly advocates in terms of who gets lured in. The best version of communism is probably the one that wishes that lazy people who want free stuff would not join up and advocate it. And principled libertarian theorists presumably don’t want advocates who only want the freedom to pollute and shoot things all day long. And yet, ultimately the movement may be dominated by the worst version of itself. Libertarianism has this to such an extreme though. What can we learn from that?

Moral cultures

There is a provocative article, Campbell and Manning (2014), which argues about microaggression in terms of moral cultures of, in order, Honor, Dignity, and Victimhood (Crib sheet). Tanner Greer likes that take too. It is an interesting perspective, although not mine. I do like the notion of moral cultures, though. What is just?

Hygiene and inner circles

Hypocrisy, mottes, baileys, inter-cultural etiquette.

Vampire-Hunting As A Vocation - Adam Elkus.


Fascinating analysis by a conservative partisan, Why is Everything Liberal?.

Fascinating business-behavioural portfolio: Francesca Gino.


Aydinonat, N. Emrah. 2008. The Invisible Hand in Economics: How Economists Explain Unintended Social Consequences. Routledge.
Baldassarri, Delia, and Guy Grossman. 2013. The Effect of Group Attachment and Social Position on Prosocial Behavior. Evidence from Lab-in-the-Field Experiments.” Edited by Angel Sánchez. PLoS ONE 8 (3): e58750.
Baron, Robert S. 2005. So Right It’s Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37:219–53. Academic Press.
Bergh, Jeroen C J M van den, and John M Gowdy. 2009. A Group Selection Perspective on Economic Behavior, Institutions and Organizations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72 (1): 1–20.
Bergstrom, Theodore C. 2002. Evolution of Social Behavior: Individual and Group Selection.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16: 67–88.
Bowles, Samuel. 2001. Individual Interactions, Group Conflicts, and the Evolution of Preferences.” Social Dynamics 155: 190.
Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. 1992. Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizable Groups.” Ethology and Sociobiology 13 (3): 171–95.
Bretherton, R, and Robin I M Dunbar. 2020. Dunbar’s Number Goes to Church: The Social Brain Hypothesis as a Third Strand in the Study of Church Growth.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 42 (1): 63–76.
Campbell, Bradley, and Jason Manning. 2014. Microaggression and Moral Cultures.” Comparative Sociology 13 (6): 692–726.
Cantu, Edward, and Lee Jussim. 2021. Microaggressions, Questionable Science, and Free Speech.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3822628. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Cheng, Joey T., Jessica L. Tracy, and Joseph Henrich. 2010. Pride, Personality, and the Evolutionary Foundations of Human Social Status.” Evolution and Human Behavior 31 (5): 334–47.
Chu, Johan S. G., and James A. Evans. 2021. Slowed Canonical Progress in Large Fields of Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (41): e2021636118.
Couzin, Iain D., Christos C. Ioannou, Güven Demirel, Thilo Gross, Colin J. Torney, Andrew Hartnett, Larissa Conradt, Simon A. Levin, and Naomi E. Leonard. 2011. Uninformed Individuals Promote Democratic Consensus in Animal Groups.” Science 334 (6062): 1578–80.
DeDeo, Simon, and Elizabeth A. Hobson. 2021. From Equality to Hierarchy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (21): e2106186118.
Demetriou, Dan. 2016. “Fighting Together: Civil Discourse and Agonistic Honor.” In Honor in the Modern World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Laurie Johnson and Dan Demetriou, 21–42. Lexington Books.
Dowding, Keith. 2016. Albert O. Hirschman, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.” In Albert O. Hirschman, edited by Martin Lodge, Edward C. Page, and Steven J. Balla. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.
Dunbar, Robin I M. 1993. Coevolution of Neocortex Size, Group Size and Language in Humans.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4): 681–94.
Gould, Roger V. 2002. The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (5): 1143–78.
Hayward, John. 1999. Mathematical Modeling of Church Growth.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 23 (4): 255–92.
———. 2005. A General Model of Church Growth and Decline.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 29 (3): 177–207.
Henrich, Joseph, and Robert Boyd. 1998. The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences.” Evolution and Human Behavior 19 (4): 215–41.
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press.
Horst, Ulrich, Alan Kirman, and Miriam Teschl. 2007. Changing Identity: The Emergence of Social Groups.” Economics Working Paper 0078. Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
Klug, Michael, and James P. Bagrow. 2016. Understanding the Group Dynamics and Success of Teams.” Royal Society Open Science 3 (4).
Lilienfeld, Scott O. 2017. Microaggressions: Strong Claims, Inadequate Evidence.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (1): 138–69.
Maner, Jon K. 2017. Dominance and Prestige: A Tale of Two Hierarchies.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (6): 526–31.
Mäs, Michael, Andreas Flache, Károly Takács, and Karen A. Jehn. 2013. In the Short Term We Divide, in the Long Term We Unite: Demographic Crisscrossing and the Effects of Faultlines on Subgroup Polarization.” Organization Science 24 (3): 716–36.
McClure, Jennifer M. 2017. ‘Go and Do Likewise’: Investigating Whether Involvement in Congregationally Sponsored Community Service Activities Predicts Prosocial Behavior.” Review of Religious Research 59 (3): 341–66.
Nagai, Althea. 2017. The Pseudo-Science of Microaggressions.” Academic Questions 30 (1): 47–57.
Nowak, Martin A. 2006. Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 314 (5805): 1560–63.
Olson, Mancur. 2009. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Vol. 124. Harvard University Press.
Pavlogiannis, Andreas, Josef Tkadlec, Krishnendu Chatterjee, and Martin A. Nowak. 2018. Construction of Arbitrarily Strong Amplifiers of Natural Selection Using Evolutionary Graph Theory.” Communications Biology 1 (1): 1–8.
Post, Daniel J. van der, Mathias Franz, and Kevin N. Laland. 2016. Skill Learning and the Evolution of Social Learning Mechanisms.” BMC Evolutionary Biology 16 (1): 166.
Trouche, Emmanuel, Emmanuel Sander, and Hugo Mercier. 2014. Arguments, More Than Confidence, Explain the Good Performance of Reasoning Groups.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2431710. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Woodley, Lou, and Katie Pratt. 2020. The CSCCE Community Participation Model – A Framework to Describe Member Engagement and Information Flow in STEM Communities,” August.

No comments yet. Why not leave one?

GitHub-flavored Markdown & a sane subset of HTML is supported.