Who I donate to

Why this list

Some public goods I long for can best be achieved by outsourcing, i.e. I give someone else money to achieve them for us all. That is what charitable donation is. I mention my specific donations here because

1. I believe in normalising donations as part of a healthy society. (This is a contingent stance; many of the causes I donate to have the goal of reducing the need for charitable donation, which I think is better than having a society which relies upon affluent guilt.)
2. I hope that by highlighting the causes I donate to, I will encourage others to donate to them, so the publicity is useful leverage.
3. For my own reference, I want a centralised list of who I am donating to so that I can stop my donations if I decide the recipient is no longer the best place to send my money. Maybe if donating to saving the planet becomes the new conspicuous consumption, then not only will I look fancy, I’ll even have a planet to look fancy on.
4. Maybe you will have better ideas about whom I should donate to and will engage constructively on that topic to improve my strategy.
5. I hope that you will think I am a nice person for giving money to strangers. (Maybe I even am a nice guy? You should probably demand more stringent proof if that is a matter of import to you.)

Good.

Listing organisations here should not be taken as my personal endorsement of any individual tactical decision made by any of the organisations or individuals mention, nor my blanket support of all positions they may adopt.

Unlike, say, classic, marginalist-style, Effective Altruist organisations donor lists, there is little mention here of mosquito nets. I am more interested in moon-shots and hail-mary punts and other high-variance strategies, which the Open Philanthropy people bill as hits-based Giving, whereas the default EA strategy is low-variance.

I am interested especially in organisations which aim to change the system to enable us humans to solve problems for ourselves, i.e. disruptive changers. That is, I mostly give money to lobbyists, builders of capacity, and builders of tools. This is, IMO, a higher-risk, higher-expected-reward strategy than (important, useful) concrete certainties like mosquito nets, and also, TBH, one that I more directly benefit from personally. Enlightened mutual interest is kind of my whole thing though. Further, we are at a point in human history where high-risk high-reward is pretty much the only wise strategy. Hail-mary bets all the way.

As a side order, I give money to some creators whose work I enjoy. This amount of money is somewhat smaller than the donations to political activity.

For reference, my current donation level is 4% of my income. Unless there is an exceptional burning emergency or matching funding from a donor, I attempt to give my donations as regular recurring payments, to provide budgeting certainty to both the organisation and to myself. Also, organisations that need to raise funding by alarmism learn some unhealthy habits around crying wolf.

Money donations

Because of my work and relationships, I have private information that suggests that some of these organisations are high leverage.

• Original power: Australian-Indigenous-led campaign for self-determination through clean energy. My research into them suggests that they have high leverage to improve both indigenous self-determination outcomes and the politics of energy in Australia more broadly.
• The Guardian because they are a (relatively) credible dissident media organisation in Murdochistan.
• Effective Altruism Australia, because even though I am not impressed with their low variance portfolio, it’s tax-deductible so…
• Better Renting because land economics in Australia is cooked, and I believe under-addressed.
• RE-Alliance for social licence for renewable energy Australia. Non-tax-deductible.
• Tomorrow Movement for youth climate voices. Tax deductible.
• Richard Boyle, whose persecution by the Australian government for whistleblowing on government activity is one of several test cases in the Australian authoritarian turn. No longer taking donations.

The next few are about private and/or open source computing infrastructure.

• Thunderbird, because it is the closest to being an adequate linux email client.
• Whonix because it is a slightly esoteric bit of harm reduction for avoiding the chilling effects of state surveillance of citizen, so I figure they need it more than the less esoteric but still important tails.
• Manyverse for exactly the same reason.
• Zotero who build amazing infrastructure for my citations.

Various creators on Patreon I can’t work out how to link to en masse:

• Michael Betancourt because he is a giant nerd doing useful nerdy things for other giant nerds like me, such as explaining diffeomorphisms.
• End of shi(f)t report the most harrowing and clever nursing blog I have ever read.
• Oglaf because I like fancy dick jokes.
• Emiliano Heyns who builds extra useful infrastructure for my citations
• Marie Brennan whose books I love, why not?
• Dave Kellett
• Laszlo Montgomery, China podcaster whose idiosyncratic style, and endless fascination I find addictive and cheering. Plus also the history of China is fascinating.

Time donations

For whom I do work using my specialised skills.

• Progtech, the Progressive Tech network. I attempted to volunteer teaching data-science-for-campaigning to these folks, but they never allocated me to anyone. Progtech: you folks are welcome to get back in touch.

If your cause is righteous, you are welcome to pitch to me for a slice of my volunteer time. Send me a short paragraph making a case for what it will help (I tend to favour climate- and conflict-risk mitigation causes) and why you think it will be a high-leverage use of my time towards that goal.

Rent to first nations

A special category of donations, which I do not think is high leverage directly, but which might seed discussion.

Australia has a complicated and generally horrifying history regarding the treatment of the first people to live here. Putting that right is going to be long, slow and complicated and I am not expert in the nuances of policy to make it better. The institutions that might better the autonomy of Aboriginal people in Australia are not strong, at least not everywhere. It is not always clear how to act to make the best difference, in the sometimes-dirty power politics.

However, when it comes to paying Aboriginal people for the use of land in Australia, I think things are relatively straightforward. I am not Aboriginal, but I have common cause with the Aboriginal people of Sydney in struggling against the nascent landed caste system that is choking us all, and furrther, Aboriginal people are on average worse off than I because of it.

In institutional terms, I argue that we need a threat of credible punishment for screwing people over in order to disincentivise future screwing over of people. I do not have the power to directly institute such a system. I can make a small positive difference to Aboriginal people by paying some cash back to some of the people whose historical mistreatment has most directly benefited me, and publicising it here. Also, if I can increase the diversity and accessibility of housing to Aboriginal people in urban Australia it will also help me, personally, by getting me a more interesting, diverse and affordable place to live; we can think of that as a gentrification levy if we want.

The Pay the rent movement is all about this kind of idea.

So, to whom should I pay the rent to accomplish these goals of starting-conversations-about-fixing-equity-for-Australians? Ideally there should be an equitable system for collecting and allocating land rents to aboriginal land custodians, but that institution does not exist at the moment. This is a substantial problem — we do not have good incentive alignment in the institutions we cobble together to cover that gap and this voluntary payment does not well approximate the redress that I am suggesting would be ideal.

OK, but I am not the guy to build those hypothetical institutions. What do I do? The governing Aboriginal land council where I live, the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council does not take donations.¹ For now, the best I have is Original power, an Australian-Indigenous-led campaign for self-determination through clean energy. I will revisit this choice periodically.

Here is a handy reference to finding the traditional owners of land in Australia.