Who I donate to

Expensive virtue signalling

2019-08-20 — 2026-01-13

Wherein the author’s beneficiaries are disclosed, and a preference for high‑risk, system‑changing Australian causes is affirmed, while donations are made as regular recurring payments.

democracy
insurgency
money
wonk
Figure 1

1 Why this list

Some public goods I long for are best attained by outsourcing rather than trying to create them myself; i.e., I give someone else money to provide them for all of us. That’s what charitable donation is. I mention my specific donations here because

  1. I believe in normalizing donating in general as part of a healthy society. This is a contingent stance; many of the causes I donate to aim to reduce the need for charitable donation, which I think is better than relying on affluent guilt.

  2. I hope that by highlighting the specific causes I donate to, I’ll encourage others to donate to them, so the publicity is useful leverage.

  3. For my own reference, I want a centralized list of whom I’m donating to so that I can stop my donations if I decide a recipient is no longer the best place to send my money.

  4. Maybe by showing this list to you I’ll get feedback and better ideas about whom I should donate to, and we’ll engage constructively to improve my strategy.

  5. I hope you’ll think I’m a nice person for giving money to strangers.

    Bonus: Maybe if donating to saving the planet becomes the new conspicuous consumption, then not only will I look like a nice guy, I’ll even have a liveable planet to show off on, and people around to impress.

Good. Let’s make it rain.

Figure 2

Listing organisations here should not be taken as my personal endorsement of any individual tactical decision made by any of the organisations or individuals mentioned, nor my blanket support of all positions they may adopt. It does indicate that I feel giving them money nets out as good on average.

Unlike, say, classic marginalist-style, Effective Altruist organisations’ donor lists, there’s less emphasis here on low-variance subjects such as, e.g., mosquito nets. I’m more interested in moon-shots and hail-mary punts and other high-variance strategies, i.e. hits-based giving.

I am interested especially in organisations which aim to change the system to enable us to solve problems for ourselves, i.e. disruptive changers. That is, I mostly give to lobbyists, capacity builders, and tool builders. IMO, this is a higher-risk, higher-expected-reward strategy than important, near‑certain interventions like mosquito nets, and, TBH, I also personally benefit from it. Enlightened mutual interest is kind of my whole thing. Further, we’re at a point in human history where high-risk, high-reward is pretty much the only wise strategy. Hail-mary bets all the way.

For reference, my current donation level is unknown because I’m changing contracts at the moment, but it was 3% of my income when I last calculated. Unless there’s a truly exceptional burning emergency or matching funding from a donor, I try to give as regular recurring payments to provide budgeting certainty to both the organisation and myself. Also, organisations that raise funding by alarmism learn unhealthy habits around crying wolf.

2 Money donations

The next few are about confidentiality-respecting and/or open-source computing infrastructure.

As a side order, I give money to some creators whose work I enjoy. This is a smaller amount than my donations to political activity, and I also get benefits (ad‑free versions of the podcast, etc.), so I’m not sure it fully counts — but I’d still consume their content if I didn’t donate, so let’s count that also. Various creators on Patreon I can’t work out how to link to en masse:

3 Time donations

My current work is all consuming and I no longer volunteer as data scientist for arbitrary external organizations because my experience in attempting to do so was stressful and low-yield.

I will likely try to spin up my own civitech project this year as a bit of low-key community organising.

4 Incoming